/lit/ - Literature

>>11734228
neuro""""""science""""" is not science, its based on conjecture just like psychology except far worse in implicit dogma, people just don't question it as often because even they don't really know anything about the brain, it still remains a mystery. Following the same reasoning as neuro"""""science"""" but with something other than the brain you quickly realize how absurd this reasoning methodology is.
eg.
>when you see someone you love your pupils dilate
>this can be tried and repeated one millions of people with the exact same results
>therefore your pupiles are responsible for giving the sensation of love
>why? because it is your pupils that show a visible and measurable reaction when we show you a picture of someone you love therefore......correlation....causation....bada bing bada boom...science