/lit/ - Literature

>>7079682
>Syrian

>>4156728
What? I don't...

"Feminist propaganda"? Eh?

>>3556043

>Also, privileging the speed of light is an assumption in relativity, it really derives from Maxwell's equations.

Ok now we are getting some traction. So you are saying that because the theoretical speed of light was derived from Maxwell’s equations it was somehow inspired by this “privileging” phenomenon that seems to pop up all the time in feminism? Why can’t it be that the theoretical speed of light was part of an inspired application of mathematics that drove our understanding of the universe forward significantly? What part, exactly, do you have an issue with and why?

By the way I don’t have a working definition of this privilege thing. I mean I know the definition of the word but it seems to be applied in such mind bending ways in feminist arguments I am not sure what’s real anymore.

>They're really a totally different breed to feminism proper.

Q.E.D.

I guess you've never opened a dictionary before?

And you didn't mouse over the thing you circled?

And you didn't click on it, either?