/lit/ - Literature

>>21473598
>Hasn’t read anything of the above, including that sexual degeneracy was in no way a part of the institutionalized student-teacher relations. Fact is, it was frowned upon.
>Unintentionally hints that the only possible fags were a product of molestation cycle
And you think you’ve done something.

>topic of the thread: author on author insults
>/pol/tards sneak JK Rowling and tranny bullshit; thread is derailed.
>Jannies are absent as fuck, as usual
Wtf is wrong with this board?

>thread about italian literature
>it immediately degenerates into people arguing about carbonara recipes and screaming insults at each other
Why are we like this?

>try to meet people IRL who are into reading
>its just
>boomers who are into the biannual releases of Grisham, Tom Clancy, Patterson, Baldacci, and other boomer shlock
>past their prime women into goodreads's advertised FOTM book (who likely just buy the book so they can post on their instagram how they own it)
>right winger kiddies who read Jordan Peterson (hack fraud)
>Harry Potter fans who have reread the series for the sixth time all the way through

>>20673029
Because they don’t work in the office, when they’re out in the sun.

You trying to turn it into some ‘gotcha’, thinking people will start working outside just because their screen isn’t as reflective anymore is disconnected from office environments.

>Debates the feel of a tip
Just to show you the silliness of that argument:Don’t knock it till you tried it.

Chapter's title literary spoils the plot

>>20280418
>You understood the story? Boom there you go.
By this logic, reading the wikipedia page about his plays is the same as reading the plays themselves.

The level of this board has really plummeted in recent years.

>stream of consciousness

>>20187991
>followed by a Daenerys chapter.