/lit/ - Literature

what was his fucking problem?

Have you made it to the final boss yet?

this guy, probably

>My plan? To experience real enlightenment in union with nature. I call this "doing absolutely nothing".

What are some other anti spirituality authors aside from UG Krishnamurti (I know UG isn't actually an author but whatever)?
Was UG the only one to criticize the search for the mystical idea of enlightenment and denounce it as useless?

>refutes thought
your move, /lit/

Where might one resume his reading after being so thoroughly deprogrammed? Back at the beginning? I still find pleasure in literature and philosophy, even if they've now been denigrated to absent-minded surrogate activities for narcissistic amusement

>tfw finally digested the UG pill
I guess this is it bros, theres nothing after this

Was he the real deal? So it seems...

this man reached superior conclusions than wittgenstein, nietzsche, hume

>>15394051

>we have to go back

where do i go from here? he's like cynicism but worse. this thread is pointless since none of you has the answers but fuck it

think i might hop on anti-depressants

>>15199956
nope

Who are the biggest pseud magnets on /lit/? I'll start.

Read this ASAP. your life could depend on it.

–Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Rudolf Carnap.
–Philosophy and illusion. Morris Lazerowitz.
–What is wrong with our thoughts? David Stove.
–Must philosophers rely on intuitions? Avner Baz.

>The human thinking is born out of some sort of neurological defect in the human body. Therefore anything that is born out of human thinking is destructive

>The body does not exist except as a thought. There is one thought. Everything exists in relationship to that one thought. That thought is 'me'. Anything you experience based on thought is illusion

>The day man experienced the consciousness that made him feel separate and superior to the other forms of life, at that moment he began sowing the seeds of his own destruction

>All our experiences, spiritual or otherwise, are the basic cause of our suffering.... The body is not interested in anything that you are interested in. That is the battle that is going on all the time... There seems to be no way out....

>What I am trying to say is that there is no individual there at all. There is only a certain gathering of knowledge--which is thought--but no individuality there

>There is no such thing as your mind or my mind. May be there is such a thing as the "world mind" where all the cumulative knowledge and the experiences thereof are accumulated and passed on from generation to generation

>>14119539

idiot. if you don't understand the prior arguments that he reached to get to his conclusion (and agree with those), you're just going to cave like a bitch when anybody puts you under pressure

We are just biological beings like it or not

we are biological beings. like it or not

If all is spirit, and matter is only densified spirit, does that mean that the materialists are somewhat correct? Not in the reductive materialist sense, but in the sense that a single substrate creates all multiplicity?

i tried to warn you, but i can't

he warned us

Enlightenment is physiological.

How can one man be so based?