/lit/ - Literature

>>14936904
I know men dont to the extent that women do. But the point isnt about the degree to which it is thought, but whether it is at all. Yes, women inherently objectify themselves to attract males, middle-aged bulldyke feminists disputing this doesnt convince me of much.
>>14936931
When it fundamentally overrides the genetically-determined aesthetics of your face.
The craziest hairstyle cannot makeup for your face, it's basically an accessory, same goes for clothing, no matter how flattering.
Makeup is purposely used so excessively that it fundamentally alters the perceived proportions and structure of their faces. Men cannot cheat their genetics to this extent, and if they attempt it, they are socially crucified by women, whose eugenics-driven sexual selection mechanisms find it extremely offensive.
Consider for example a man found out to be wearing lifts. Women will mock and ridicule him because he dared to lie about his height, meanwhile, the makeup they are wearing not only conceals every flaw, but enhances and creates illusions about the bone structure of their faces.
No woman knows what canthal tilt is, bit they all apply eye makeup that creates the illusion of a positive tilt