/lit/ - Literature

Recommendations for a website with a lot of begginer texts in Hebrew?

>>14627185
>pragmatics, philosophical logic, decision theory, game theory, the theory of conditionals, epistemology, and the philosophy of mind.
>Saul Kripke, David Lewis, and Alvin Plantinga
So he is merely your average anglo bugman? Why did you post him here?

Books/videos which destroy and humiliate him?

>>14387618
>human senses cant detect whether this is true or not
says whom?

How does one experience the Demiurge? What literature goes into depth about this?

What did he mean by this?

>What Guénon is able to achieve in his thinking is, paradoxically, impossible for philosophers. Philosophers are incapable of refuting the existence of the supra-rational without contradicting their own point of view (see Guénon's ``The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times''). Although this web of logical paradox is superficially obvious, those who are not committed to recognizing Guénon's refutation will not be able to fully grasp its deeper meaning and implication.

>To Whitehead, Parmenides' prior invention of the ``philosopher'' was a form of retroactive plagiarism which must be explained, inasmuch as it is possible, in terms of a subtle prejudice against the traditional order. But while rejecting Whitehead's criteria for plagiarism, Guénon upholds the crucial difference in Parmenides' version of philosophy from that of Whitehead. Here Guénon applies masterfully the Vedic teaching that forms the basis of Classical Indian philosophy to the construction of the logical apparatus of Peirce's Principle of Sufficient Reason. However, in his interpretation of this principle, one found the Yogācāra (``epistemological methods'') of the Upanishads rather than the trite materialist pseudo-Hegelianism of Whitehead.

>``Both the Pythagoreans and the Skeptics also draw the same conclusions from their activities,'' Guénon writes, ``but they do so differently''. ``On the one hand, Pythagoreans invent ways to escape the conditions of practical existence, whereas they know nothing of human life, where we refer to both 'practical' and 'spiritual' life.'' Guénon thus asserts that neither the Pythagorean ``future'' nor the Skeptic's ``present'' are real. As I will argue, the latter fallacy is common not only in everyday philosophical internet debates, but also in the arts and sciences. Guénon intends his book to present the ideal nature of the ``rational'' creature, the lowest stage of our ``evolutionary'' ladder.