>> | No.19914562 [View] File: 2.92 MB, 1647x2099, Portrait_photoshoot_at_Worldcon_75,_Helsinki,_before_the_Hugo_Awards_–_George_R._R._Martin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Can someone explain to me why, exactly, genre fiction is bad? Without aggressive or condescending language/tone? I get the basic idea behind the fact that, as indicated by its namesake, genre fiction tends towards the generic. But every now and then you get authors like pic related who avoid a lot of tropes of the genre but are still looked down upon. Why is that? Is it just because of poor prose-writing, like the word-to-word composition is bad/cliche? I don't really see why that's essential to genre fiction, is it just a historical accident that they tend to not be able to write to a standard that academia expects? Also some concrete examples of what is meant by bad vs. good prose would be appreciated. I took a look at Le Guin's "From Elfland to Poughkeepsie" and the main point seems to be a lack of personality in the prose, is that what is meant when people say genre writers "can't write"?
|