/lit/ - Literature

>>7303118
Here is your argument.

This list is called "official" and should be taken seriously. But as an Anon who didn't vote I see this list and I can't take it that way.

See, for example, I like Richard Yates, and if I participated in your poll I would have voted for him.

With a bit luck in the after poll, he could have jumped straight to No. 65. That are 35 places with only a single vote!

One vote can change the outcome of your poll by more than 30%, one third!
I can't use a list that is that inaccurate.

>But it's a list for frequent /lit/ users not for you reddit pleb!

But /lit/ already knows the outcome of the poll. They don't need a reminder that RY got 2 votes. Hell you don't even need that list anymore but to show it to people who don't come here everyday. And for those users it would be far better if they didn't know the exact amount of votes.

As an alternative, you could scratch No. 25-100 and make a top 25 list, including the vote numbers. But I don't recommend that. Top 100 is way more impressive.

>>7247793
Olive or beige then. Maybe light blue. No hard colors. No lifeless colors.