/lit/ - Literature

>>13152690
I guarantee you that civilization will be better served by you being an amicable guy who has a career, ambitions, and relationships, rather than being a psychotic obsessive who deconstructs arguments from people who wouldn't be relevant anyway if people just ignored them. None of these people have unique ideas: if you ignore them, and read actual philosophical texts, recognized from academia, if you actually give yourself a literary regimen and stick to it, it will be better for you, the people around you, and for society as a whole. You can't "fix society" by arguing online about retards, you retard.

>>13152695
Sure, if you like. But it's in the nature of writing that when you work out your own problems, sometimes you help others with theirs.

"YouTube intellectuals" and e-celebrities make their careers on the discourse that surrounds them. I'm saying, as someone who used to spend too much time on such things, that you'll inevitably find these people are part of a larger, more important, more interesting discourse, and if you participate in that, you'll find yourself wiser, smarter, and most importantly, you won't give validation to a bunch of smug cunts who already make far too much money on patreon anyway. More than that, you'll kick yourself for not looking for that higher discourse sooner, and you'll find that it was always there, but you got distracted by these uninteresting people putting out flat takes.

Just walk away, anon. You have the power within you to educate yourself on important matters, and when someone comes along and tries to tell you why they are oh so smart and clever, you'll be able to judge them properly.