/lit/ - Literature

>>22267109
A few of the recent /lit/ things that were legitimately good:
>Husky Mutt Puppy
>No Adonis Has Come to Stay
>Mixtape Hyperborea
Not interested in your opinion since these are objective facts and you just want to revel in piss and reread muh classics

>>21031231
>>21031361
>It's just a little competition, sure maybe some favoritism by other groups
>WHITE MEN NEED NOT APPLY
>that's right, I publish under a woman's name - but only because I'm so clever! Just stop your complaining and pretend you're a woman like me
(You are here)
>sure I take estrogen, cut off my balls, and am chest feeding my adopted niglet as I type this but it's all just to keep up appearances so that I can get published (gotta hustle). Can you all just STOP saying it's unfair? In 10,000 BC they didn't even have books you guise

Legitimately the voice of the oppressed, the quisling. The battered spouse always has a million justifications to preserve their own sense of dignity and obscure the ugly compromises that linger like a horse pill in their throat.

>>20316852
Just looked it up and Sandersoy says 2k per day is his benchmark, but measuring per day is deceptive because it's his full-time job (he says he writes 4-16 hours per day depending on inspiration/deadlines). Very different from someone with an unrelated full time job where getting 500-1k per day (over maybe 2 hours if you're lucky) is nothing to sneeze at.

Nothing wrong with writing fast (I do sometimes too) but many of the people you see banging on about 5k per day or whatever tend to be borderline personalities working in isolation/not taking criticism and producing unintelligible drek from the samples I've seen. Tldr: try to make your process efficient, but don't sacrifice quality for a hollow goal like daily word count a reader will never know about.