/lit/ - Literature

>>12011779
The article is a relatively quick read, so I encourage you to try again.

The interpretation you have is only viable if you just read the first couple of paragraphs and skip the rest.

But even if you're right and the article is just yet another criticism of neoliberalism, there's still value in reading the method by which the author arrives at this conclusion.

But you're not right. The article includes a criticism of Maps of Meaning and 12 Rules for Life for being either vague or stupid, but also castigates the left for being useless. It also includes a transcript of a portion of a Peterson lecture and diagrams from Maps. Robinson engages with the the content of Jordan Peterson's work and still wins.

I'm guessing that reading comprehension wasn't your strong suit in school?