/lit/ - Literature

Discuss this work

Discuss

>What is the CTMU?
The CTMU is a theory of mathematical metaphysics introduced by Christopher Langan in the 1980s.

>Why is the CTMU important?
The CTMU proves that God exists by providing a valid framework for the overall structure of reality, and showing that this structure exhibits properties traditionally attributed to God. In doing so, the CTMU provides the logical foundation of a Theory of Everything; and thereby constitutes absolute truth.

>In which sense is the CTMU mathematical?
The CTMU is logical and mathematical because it explicitly contains logical and mathematical structures, concepts, and reasoning.

>What exactly is Chris Langan trying to convey in the CTMU (in layman's terms), and what is his goal/expectation in doing so?
https://archive.is/9ey14

>What’s the most useful and tangible consequence of the CTMU?
https://archive.is/9LPK5

>Why do we need the CTMU? X philosopher says the same thing!
The CTMU is unique in that it is able to justify its claims on logical grounds.

https://files.catbox.moe/wkgrgy.pdf

>What is the CTMU?
The CTMU is a theory of mathematical metaphysics introduced by Christopher Langan in the 1980s.

>Why is the CTMU important?
The CTMU proves that God exists by providing a valid framework for the overall structure of reality, and showing that this structure exhibits properties traditionally attributed to God. In doing so, the CTMU provides the logical foundation of a Theory of Everything; and thereby constitutes absolute truth.

>In which sense is the CTMU mathematical?
The CTMU is logical and mathematical because it explicitly contains logical and mathematical structures, concepts, and reasoning.

>What exactly is Chris Langan trying to convey in the CTMU (in layman's terms), and what is his goal/expectation in doing so?
https://archive.is/9ey14

>What’s the most useful and tangible consequence of the CTMU?
https://archive.is/9LPK5

>Why do we need the CTMU? X philosopher says the same thing!
The CTMU is unique in that it is able to justify its claims on logical grounds.

https://files.catbox.moe/wkgrgy.pdf

>What is the CTMU?
The CTMU is a theory of mathematical metaphysics introduced by Christopher Langan in the 1980’s.

>Why is the CTMU important?
The CTMU proves that God exists by providing a valid framework for the overall structure of reality, and showing that this structure exhibits properties traditionally attributed to God. In doing so, the CTMU provides the logical foundation of a Theory of Everything; and thereby constitutes absolute truth.

>In which sense is the CTMU mathematical?
The CTMU is logical and mathematical because it explicitly contains logical and mathematical structures, concepts, and reasoning.

>What exactly is Chris Langan trying to convey in the CTMU (in layman's terms), and what is his goal/expectation in doing so?
https://archive.is/9ey14

>What’s the most useful and tangible consequence of the CTMU?
https://archive.is/9LPK5

>Why do we need the CTMU? X philosopher says the same thing!
The CTMU is unique in that it is able to justify its claims on logical grounds.

https://files.catbox.moe/wkgrgy.pdf

>>21870245
>I don't have much of an interest in medieval philosophy, is it okay to skip over that? Is Descartes necessary? What about Leibniz? Spinoza? Locke? Etc
Skip everyone including Kant and go straight to the end

>>21579664
You talk about cybernetics, Langan posits reality as a self-configuring self-processing language the currency of which is self-transducing information. He has in fact constructed an entire "metaformal system" that accommodates this language. You talk about circular causality, Langan actually explains why reality must be circular via the concept of "self-determinacy" deduced from the reality principle. He is capable of proving your quoted text via the mathematical concept of syndiffeonesis. Basically, everything Hegel can do, Langan does better because he provides the logico-mathematical structure necessary to support his claims. Although people like to think Hegel does this, he doesn't. Any questions?

>>21571180
You may read this if you want to understand why God must logically exist. When I say logically, I mean that the premises are absolutely undeniable, and they are necessarily valid under the rules of propositional and predicate logic. If you don't want that, then you can read whatever else gets posted here (hint: there is not one single work in existence that can provide a proof of the kind described above other than the CTMU).

Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre a close second