/lit/ - Literature

Why do so many existentialists just make up unverifiable statements?
Retarded shit like
>the average western male's ideal is a woman who freely submits to his domination. Who does not accept his ideas without some discussion but yields to his reasoning, who intelligently resists but yields in the end.
Why does Beauvoir think that western men in general want specifically their woman to "yield to his reasoning" as opposed hoping that every single person on the planet will "yield to his reasoning"? And not just men but women as well? Because surely, if you are reasoning for something you must implicitly want to be correct and for the other person to be wrong.
These people claim to "understand" humanity the best yet they seem incapable of empathy or critically examining their own perspectives.
They're like sophists who never actually analyse the shit they say. And whrn you ask them they just say "oh you know it's complicated" expecting you to keep giving their opinions the light of day.

>>22377448

I think he looks alright without the eye

What literature would help an INFP male self actualize?

>>15123706
You're wrong and a newfag if you think all these things are antithetical to /lit/

>>15014530

Imagine having wonky eyes, being french, and a manlet while still getting mad pussy because of your big brain

Write whacky philosophical novels

>Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

Damn, /lit/ BTFO by Sartre over 100 years before they existed. How do you even respond to this?