/lit/ - Literature

>>17112922

Because they are mainly known for some relatively short books that don't require a very deep knowledge on the subject.

I mean ,a fuckton of these people would get filtered by the very first three books of The World as Will and Representation, it doesn't matter that if we go by Schopenhauer's own words/conception both budism and christianity systems are also pessimist. Midwits just read the Wikipedia entries and then try to argue with you that "Nah, Schopenhauer wanted to kill himself"

>>15320831
Haha, very based my good man! Very based indeed! To the question that you pose with such melancholy, I beg you prick your ear to my answer: Fucking kill yourself. That's correct, you did not mishear -- kill yourself. But, my good gentlemen, I hear you ask, "But why! why must I kill myself?" And I'll tell you that too. Nay, I will force you to listen, and implore you commit suicide in due haste after grasping my irrefutable logic; you are a nigger; you are the blackest gorilla nigger I have ever seen. There is no mistaking it: A nigger. And, and all good gentlemen (to which I must now exclude yourself), know that a nigger -- of whom skin is dark and mind dim -- can never write well, proper, or even inoffensively... I see, you are not convinced, typical of a nigger, so allow me to propose you a question: Tell me, nigger, is your writing not... niggerlious? I rest my case and bid you never post again, for the very thought of your monkey fingers banging out your wails of woe about things you cannot, will not, and should not comprehend brings me to convulsions in sheer disgust. Have a good day.

>>15276656
Anon, do you not know what a nihilist is? If he deems possessions worth defending or claiming, therefore they have meaning and value, which is quite the opposite of what nihilism is about. Dummy.
>>15276701
Okay, so why doesn't he? And if I think it funny, he would agree that me killing him would be acceptable. The only thing going in circles are concepts above your head.