/lit/ - Literature

>>20803507
If you want something that will absolutely crush the new atheists, then I would recommend this book, since it is by far the most compelling argument for why near-death experiences (NDEs) should be taken seriously, and that is not just my opinion but the actual experts in the field agree:

https://www.amazon.com/Why-Afterlife-Obviously-Exists-Realer-Than-Real/dp/1785359851/

It makes a huge deal about the fact that near-death experiencers (NDErs) are representative of the population as a whole, and that when people go deep into the NDE, they all become convinced. As this article points out:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mysteries-consciousness/202204/does-afterlife-obviously-exist

>"Statistics collected ... show that the “deeper” the NDE ... the greater the percentage of those who come away certain of the existence of the afterlife. Among those with the deepest experiences ... 100 percent came away agreeing with the statement, “An afterlife definitely exists”."

Since NDErs are representative of the population as a whole, and they are all convinced, then 100% of the population become convinced that there is an afterlife when they have a sufficiently deep NDE themselves. And so would you, me, or anyone, including the most dogmatic atheists and skeptics, because it is VASTLY more self-evidently real than this puny little experience of life on Earth we have now. When you dream and wake up, you immediately realize that life is more real than your dream. When you have an NDE, the same thing is happening, but on a higher level, as you immediately realize that life is the deep, deep dream and the NDE world is the real world.

There is a reason why Kenneth Ring, a leading NDE researcher, said about it that, "On finishing it, I doubt any reader will not be convinced that death is not a dead end.", and it is because it absolute destroys the skeptical approach at the roots.

I have written a book, and I have occasionally used quotes from things people say in YouTube-videos. Can this ever be a copyright issue? Similarly, I have used a few quotes from DVDs. Can this also be a copyright-issue? They are short quotes, less than 300 words, and they are sourced properly. But it is hard to find any information about this. I do know that using quotes from songs can be a quagmire, but I am unsure about this. Can anyone please help me shed some light on this?

>>13933622
Somebody already pointed out its more like a bunch of dudes eating out of you cheerios bowl and backwashing into it and then you have to eat the dregs

>>13928883
Because that would be inconvenient to non-Vedantic theology