/lit/ - Literature

>>21642891
>but it is healthier when you are dedicated to make a change in the world.
I guess I can't sincerely believe that whatever change I'd be trying to make actually makes enough of a difference to bother trying. If you don't believe in it, it doesn't really work psychologically. If anything it's just demoralising and fatalism by contrast becomes liberating and weirdly pleasant. This is probably just a difference in personal psychology though.

>Therefore I am already thinking of saving all my money to get away from the system, I already thought of some places where I could move and slowly leave the system.
I took the path of welfare leech. Just living a simple frugal life on the edge of town, sucking on the teat of civilisation and just doing whatever I like all day which includes rambling around in the forest and sitting by ponds and bike rides by the river and such. It felt like the quickest and most realistic way for me to drop out of the vast majority of the bullshit normie contemporary life requires. That's where I think the Cynics were wise: A lot of the personal downsides of living in civilisation can be negated if you're willing to make certain sacrifices, maybe even to the degree of that typical angst almost completely going away.

>The system is like a tyrant on life-support, the hospital where it is interned is heavy guarded, but we could at least try to impede that the tyrant live for more than it needs, we can't go there and kill him, but we can try to undermine his supplies.
Asking you to elaborate about this would probably enter fed territory but if you mean stuff like Ted did I think it only ruins your own life and doesn't hasten the fall of technological society by a single day. Pic related makes more sense to me.