/lit/ - Literature

>>19787280
The point is that you can reduce every bad thing into one thing and then get rid of that one ultimately bad thing by recognising its source in yourself and confessing it away. How can that be wrong?
>>19787233
Overzealous in what sense? It is possible to postulate an emotional reduction base of two which can be seen as the division of emotions into positive and negative emotions, however one would like to define them. If there is an impediment to experiencing positive emotions, that impediment is the source of all negative emotion by definition. Now you have two options. That source is either inside of you or outside of you. If it is outside of you, you will want to destroy the world, because it is the source of negative emotion. If it is inside of you, you will want to destroy it without destroying yourself because otherwise you lose all positive emotion. How can you do that in any other way than confession? OP is clearly self-destructive.

>>19705399
>its not a refutation but
>>19705416
>Your only refutation is