/lit/ - Literature

>>22549733
>Everyone is arguing about and critiquing “wokeness”, but if I want to actually understand their perspective, what are the foundational works from where it comes from and are influenced by? Not critiques of it.
occupy wall street

>>19918750
>It's part of a broader demoralization campaign to destroy the will of the population.
This is (indirectly) profitable to them, because if the general population had a strong enough will to rebel, then they would lose their consoomer base, and thus, their power and profit. They need the majority of the population to be demoralized hedonists to feel safe that their position of power won't be taken from them. This is why people who are virtuous, self-sufficient and/or self-determining are so threatening to the elite

>>19547930

>>15723053
I would consider all of these things to be liberal and inherently right wing since they seek to distract the proletariat from class warfare, feminism and identify politics are a tool to subvert workers movements. There is a reason why large companies support social justice. Your notion of left and right is based on autistic YouTube video culture and not on economics. Read capital if you actually wish to gain and understanding of what the left is.

The difference between a paleoconservative and an effective Marxist is much smaller than is currently believed

>>9509673
COINTELPRO

>>8854088
I agree, the modern world is a failed project, but it must be accelerated to truly bring change now. Perhaps, this is some huge irony, that we are all leading ourselves into doom.