/lit/ - Literature

I often see atheists or other non-Christians try to attack Christianity by saying things like "Lol you can't eat pork or shellfish" or things like that.
It's like, do these people even try to learn anything about Christianity before they try to attack it?
The Bible explicitly condemns the Judaizers as heretics!
Why do these people think that they can outsmart Christianity with these silly criticisms that even the Bible explicitly contradicts?

>>20422743
Firstly, it contradicts Genesis, which is a true account of literal real historical events. It also has allegorical meaning, but this does not by any means contradict the literal historicity. Do not be fooled by liberal humanist academics who treat it as ONLY allegorical!
Secondly, Maximus the Confessor, who lived over a thousand years before Charles Darwin, already proved that evolution is metaphysically impossible. A species with its own nature cannot change from its origin into a different species. If it could, then it could never stop changing according to its nature because a species with a nature of not changing cannot come from a nature of changing, nor could it become a species with a nature of changing, as either of these would violate its nature. It also is not the case that a species could from its origin change and never stop changing because what has an origin must have a telos. A created object cannot move in a direction infinitely.
Thirdly, evolution presupposes a nominalist paradigm, which is false. Universal categories are real and distinct.
Fourthly, evolution is Masonic propaganda.