/lit/ - Literature

>>21735143
Embarrassed Harris and Hitchens so thoroughly that Dawkins had to make stupid excuses not to debate him.

>>21322912
>loses debate to evangelical
>proceeds to rail against someone who isnt even Christian when they cant defend themselves
Vegans are as cowardly as they are stupid

>multiple phd's in theology, christian apology, philosophy of religion, and metaphysics
>well versed in logic
>calm, polite, reasonable, rational, and clearheaded
>khalam has been made pretty much airtight over several decades of refining

Is this guy the atheist's worst nightmare? Not saying he's right but every atheist I've seen who goes against him starts panics and starts resorting to fallacies and ad hominems at some point. Even Hitchens. Though hitchens didn't even bother trying and started going full polemic from the get go. The only exception might be Sean Carrol, though WLC really made the mistake of going against a physicist on his home turf.

How do I refute him?

>>19818796
Who?

>>19665289
Undefeated

btfo's hitchens and all the new atheists

Have any atheists managed to win or even score points against him in a formal debate? It seems like whenever I watch a debate with him the atheist side is either not correctly refuting all his points, not addressing his challenges, or just using fallacious reasoning.

>>18205736
God=the good, fuck you

How does someone this big brained end up an evangelical?

>>16867476
It is more probable that (you) are a faggot than (you) not being a faggot

It is more plausible that God exists than the universe popping into existence out of nothing

>BTFOs Hitchens FOREVER
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0tYm41hb48o

Heh. Nothing personal kid

Where do I start with this nigga?

>>16153119
>slaughters you on stage
I'm not sure how these clowns are STILL taken seriously by some people

>>16043934
Not everyone is a Biblical literalist. Read pic related if you want your fundamentalist dick sucked. Gosh, what do you mean by biased? This is nothing like how a Dawkins or Hitchens would handle it. You could benefit from a perspective that avoids referencing subsequent Christian doctrine.

>History is mostly guessing. The rest is prejudice.
-Will Durant

How does this guy manage to study and write from morning till night every day? Are there any books I can read on developing this sort of work ethic?

>Non-believers BTFO

>>13697727
*makes you shit, piss and cum in your bed*
nothng personnel kiddo

>>9181190
There's no good way to live most philosophies. There's a reason you look like a meme if you even try.

There's one philosophy in existence at the moment that you can live without edge or cringe and totally earnestly. It's called Christianity.

Clean yourself up, get a haircut, practice healthy living, be kind to people, admonish sin, practice virtue. Every other way is a meme and you know this.

>>6718398
That's the author, by the way, a William Lane Craig.

What does /lit/ think of William Lane Craig? I realize his divine command theory of morality is retarded, since dct was BTFO by Leibniz, but what of his apologetics for the historicity of the gospels? Is there any theologian who does a better job here than he does?

http://www.amazon.com/Assessing-Testament-Historicity-Resurrection-Christianity/dp/0889466165