/lit/ - Literature

>Tfw the idealists were right all along
It's been known for almost 120 years now, and this one paper isn't likely to enlighten low-IQ realists. They will redefine the "observer" to mean a classical measuring apparatus (as if there's a clear cut between two worlds governed by different laws); "observation" to some interaction between said device and particles (as if they were lil' billiard balls), or, even worse yet: cling to some silly "interpretation" incompatible with special relativity (Bohm) and no-cloning theorem (Everett)
>Also, any good books about idealism in general?
anything by Bernard d'Espagnat

>>12676035
Yes, it's only the Christfags who find materialism deficient