/lit/ - Literature

>>14710052
How about real wages?

>>2327294
oops forgot my pic

>>1879263

>The federal reserve.

Did you honestly believe that was an argument, and not just proof that you're a child of zeitgeist? What exactly do you believe that proves and how?

>>1879263

>LOL WHAT FUCKING PRODUCTION HAS THERE BEEN YOU RETARD?

The economy has grown throughout the entire period shown. It was growing while real wages were declining between Q1 2005 & Q2 2006. You stated that wages increase when the economy grows: that hypothesis has just been empirically falsified.
Also, worker productivity has increased in the US while real wages have stagnated; pic related. How can you explain this, given your market fetishism?

>I've ignored countless examples of the market working well throughout history and substitute it for my

No, it means exactly what it says: childish intuitions are not a substitute for empirical research and reality.

>flawed angry humanity hating marxist theories.

Laughable. I do not believe what you want me to believe. I suppose that, if I did, it would be much easier to argue with me for you. Shame.

>Yes I did, keynes has been responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths and even more suffering and pain.

Demonstrate it, don't assert it.
I assert that Hayek raped children's faces with his big manly cock.