/lit/ - Literature

>>16437970
Nah that was this fucktard degenerate

>>12973983
You sure about that?

>>8717802
>Free will
meme
free will does not exist as its just one organs (like some thought in mind), giving orders to other organs, so body is not really free, its slave of needs. Also there is no evidence that "i think" exists, and thoughts arent just random

how do I write like Melville? I want my writing to be hard to follow to make people think I'm smart

>>8511736
"the values of the herd should rule in the herd"

It's like you made the most un-Nietzsche-esque statement possible. Jesus, people on this board actually think they understand Nietzsche

>>8504127
>I can understand why someone would want a very short intro. to Kant
I can see why, but it's still shit, you can't condense an authors thought into that short amount of pages and still expect it to come out coherent.

Short introductions are okay if they are just that. Introductions that imply you're going to read more. But it makes me nervous to think that someone is going to read The Short Introduction to Kant and then dismiss its articulation of the Categorical Imperative since it can't be found embedded in his wider perspective on rationality and the human subject.

I had to read ASITexistentialism for a class and it was horrible, it presented the existentialists in pretty much the way that the mainstream tends to view them, without any nuance and quite juvenile.

My prof recently published the short introduction to Hermeneutics, I haven't read it yet, but it's pretty much the summary of the class I took with him anyway, so I probably won't bother when I've already read Gadamer and Riceour etc. in their own words.

>>8250268
just posting this photo
bye

>>8132575
>>8133631
>>8133791
>>8137814
ridiculous.

>>7832301
This desu