/lit/ - Literature

>>2432721

>I didn't even read the replies

Try reading them.

OP's image being shopped or not, I've actually seen a few idiotic ads like that where I live.

They really don't think much of people's intelligence, do they?

>TPB is totally funding Al Qaeda, you guise! Evidence? Facts? What the hell do you mean? It's on a billboard, how can it possibly not be 100% legit?

>2011
>Still taking judeo-christian religions literally
>Still anthropomorphizing the primum movens
>ISHYGDDT

>any value other than entertainment

>>1866908

Because that's totally not what D&E was doing in that quote of yours, amirite?

>>1805932

>4chan is SRS BZNZ

None of the cool kids like LotR anymore, OP. Get with the program.

>mfw this board's average age is about 17

>People using the phrase "literary merit" as though it actually means anything

>My face

>Implying the so-called "classics" weren't just standard pop fiction from their respective times that were elevated to godly status by academic consensus

>>555399

Oh, yeah, Sade definitely employs violence to highlight the shallowness and consummerism of the 1980s.

Totally valid comparison there, bro.

>>550678

>a naked blue guy who survived a nuclear explosion thing

>superpowers

>flat characters who never change or grow

>I've never read Watchmen

Also, polite sage for off-topic. Discussion of comics should go in /co/