/lit/ - Literature

>>23009433
>And I exposed my ill-expressed thoughts to someone who went to one of the best and most selective schools in the world for continental philosophy (I am european, so using this label already sounds a bit like a treason) and after banging them to him for like 2 years he declared that if I was able to express them properly, that would be a revolution (I don't think I am able, and it's not like it matters, see the scientific quasi-paranormal aspect of "my" "thoughts").
Perhaps I did not communicate myself properly - I did not mean to invoke my education to develop the logic I am utilizing in my response to you. Rather, I invoked my education to explain how from your writing I get the impression you have not moved beyond Kant or anyone of contemporary importance when it comes to philosophical fundamentals.

>And I am sitting on some empirical scientific result (what kickstarted everything in the first place because some "faith", some a priori knowledge of the "previous frame" had already taken hold of me in "a challenge to the doors of time") which may be interesting to the scientific I quoted above.
Perhaps I have missed something, but how has your empirical deduction challenged the Kantian notions of energy and being? (If we can agree Kant is the basis we all must be operating from).

>Yes I was mean, sorry, let's carry on with this conversation like gentlemen
My apologies for any rudeness as well. I only respond to posts like yours because they are far higher effort than you normally see on this website.

>>9598451
William Blake, the most gifted poet of all time.

This thread reminds me of /pol/'s terrible attempts at "classical art" threads

>>9538877
This one is especially bad

>>9538882
>>9539616
>>9540622
>>9540980
>>9540986
>>9541362
Congrats on not having shit taste