/lit/ - Literature

I'm looking for a quote from Land, something to the effect of "Anyone separating AI and capitalism fundamentally misunderstands both."

There's also a formulation along the lines of "1. Intelligence is the ability to win games effectively.
2. Capitalism is a series of these logic games on a massive scale.
3. The market is then a sort of intelligence building itself."

Any Help would be much appreciated.

>>17508816
>>17508922
>>17509149
>>17509192

This. Land can only improve recent /lit/. I think we should discuss acc more, not less.

I'm so fucking happy Fanged Noumena made it on there. Accbros, we made it.

>>16849232
I think the Nietzsche comparison works more effectively if only for Nick's edge-factor. I would agree that the aftermath of Nick Land's thought resembles Hegel though.

>>16769227
>>16769244

Very interesting points, I really appreciate it when people on this board actually have reasoned arguments. I see what you mean about people like Kaczynski and the consoomer/career chasers, and I think you have a good point with them being as anti-human/orders following as the algorithm is, just behaviorally. Technocapital being a human machination I'm not as sold on. Obviously, it needed us as some point, but I think when you look at wall street, and see that our global financial infrastructure is 90% automated, it's hard to argue that everything still relies on human will. However, your comments about parliamentarian socialists is spot on. The argument for "harnessing" capital is braindead. To me, Deleuzian "line of flight" or other escape-oriented responses make a lot more sense. I think WtP works with escape or resistance a lot better than harnessing, in a kind of "surf Kali-Yuga" manner.

>>16682531
Thanks fren

>>16640900
Young Adult

Because all good ideas come from queers