/lit/ - Literature

>>14144184
>And dark blue and light blue can easily and fundamentally be seen as different colors
Only insofar as one is encultured to see them that way. The way we think and perceive the world is highly influenced by the language we learn as children. This is why I mentioned it, even after imparting this knowledge to you, thought you may try your best, you would not be able to differentiate between the two faster than a Russian (generally speaking)

However are they different colors, or shades and hues of the same color? These are not dictated by the same phenomenology, and are in fact radically different.

>You can easily understand this looking on your screen right now.
I have exceptionally strong differentiation and detection between shades, hues and tints of the entire visible spectrum. Through testing, I found I could reliably distinguish around 90% of 32-bit depth colors (No, I did not mean to type 24-bit), which is just under 4 billion unique intensities and wavelengths of light. If 2 sufficiently different video codecs are used to compress a video, I can differentiate them based on the compression. I am in the very top of the 1 percentile of color acuity. Observationally, my spectrum of experience would contain more forms, yet functionally everything is the same.

Despite this, I cannot identify light blue faster than a Russian.

>Aren't sine waves perceptual propagations of sound waves?
No. Sine waves are the graphical representation of the set produced by measuring the ration of the hypotenuse of a right triangle to the side opposite of the right triangle's angle plugged into the sine "operator".

It's called a wave because it looks like a wave when graphed.

>A sine would be the most exterior and extended manifestation of that element
No. The triangle's proportions would, and even that is dubious, because a set of ALL proportions must be measured to graph the sine wave. The series however, is axiomatically complete in and of itself, and in the basest arithmetics in sigma notation, communicates a relation between circles and triangles, and the geometric significance of euler's theories that is otherwise unjustifiable.