/lit/ - Literature

>>22764128
Say something critical that doesn't relate to sex, relationships, popularity, or social acceptability.

>>22131347

>>21599909
What problem? I'd like to see how you refute picrel. Dude offed himself because he couldn't cope with his Jewish nature which he considered as basal as a woman's,

>>21591338
Women are thoroughly and inseparably submerged in the slime of their sexuality. There's nothing else on their minds, just fucking and everything adjacent to fucking.

Sex and Character by Otto Weininger (new translation)

Thorstein Veblen, Theory of The Leisure Class
>So, then, wherever wasteful expenditure and the show of abstention from effort is normally, or on an average, carried to the extent of showing obvious discomfort or voluntarily induced physical disability. There the immediate inference is that the individual in question does not perform this wasteful expenditure and undergo this disability for her own personal gain in pecuniary repute, but in behalf of some one else to whom she stands in a relation of economic dependence; a relation which in the last analysis must, in economic theory, reduce itself to a relation of servitude.

>To apply this generalization to women's dress, and put the matter in concrete terms: the high heel, the skirt, the impracticable bonnet, the corset, and the general disregard of the wearer's comfort which is an obvious feature of all civilized women's apparel, are so many items of evidence to the effect that in the modern civilized scheme of life the woman is still, in theory, the economic dependent of the man—that, perhaps in a highly idealized sense, she still is the man's chattel. The homely reason for all this conspicuous leisure and attire on the part of women lies in the fact that they are servants to whom, in the differentiation of economic functions, has been delegated the office of putting in evidence their master's ability to pay. There is a marked similarity in these respects between the apparel of women and that of domestic servants, especially liveried servants. In both there is a very elaborate show of unnecessary expensiveness, and in both cases there is also a notable disregard of the physical comfort of the wearer. But the attire of the lady goes farther in its elaborate insistence on the idleness, if not on the physical infirmity of the wearer, than does that of the domestic. And this is as it should be; for in theory, according to the ideal scheme of the pecuniary culture, the lady of the house is the chief menial of the household."

>>21427623

>>21391291
>sexual daredevils began with men like oscar wilde
Late 19th century women weren't allowed to act out like Oscar Wilde (even he got fucked up for his antics) and there was a good reason to keep them docile and domesticated. If you're admitting that woman's nature is that of a childish whore, why do they get to enjoy equal rights and privileges? None of the accountability, needless to say.

>>21372909

>>21329474

This exposes and enrages the cunt-brained foid

>>21246669
That's how it is. Picrel are the words of the blackpill master himself.

>>21232479
Yeah, accurate. Woman has nothing except her sexuality so it consumes her whole life, but the most off-putting trait is the innate dishonesty. I'd tolerate an oversocialized midwit who just wants to be seduced, fucked and cuddled all day (while I provide everything else for the relationship to work) but I can't put up with the constant lying. She'll lie and deceive just to "shit-test" you, and if you fall for it instead of yelling/threatening her (which she enjoys), it becomes okay to lie about everything in her head - like fucking her ex while leeching off all your resources.

>>21207109

>>20978158
This. Schoppie and Weininger already dissected the woman problem perfectly, there's of value nothing to add. Only copes and delusions.

>>20978158
This. Schoppie and Stirner already dissected the woman problem perfectly, there's of value nothing to add. Only copes and delusions.

>>20972206
this
>>20972253
this
>>20972454
this

>>20857736
Weininger compressed to a 4chan post. Very nice and absolutely true.
Learn to control your sexuality by fapping once a week and don't even acknowledge women.
Your life will improve tenfold.

>>20836840
There are two types of heterosexual men and one type of woman. If you don't take my word for it, try Camille Paglia (Sexual Personae) or Esther Vilar (The Manipulated man). Picrel is Weininger's analysis of the woman problem - it's 100% consistent with my real life experience.

Because this is all their minds are capable of
>>20822806
>>20822943

>sex sex who has had sex has he had sex would i have sex with him sex i am sex
Ancient pagan and Christian saying: "tota mulier sexus / uterus " - woman is entirely sex/womb. Pic related. Man has a sex drive that can intrude on everything he does and control him if he doesn't control it, but women ARE a sex drive, simply sublimated into everything they do. That is why any time a woman (or a simp mirroring women's opinions in an attempt to please them) sees something she doesn't like, she can only think to shame it sexually, or do so by proxy ("you aren't popular/acceptable enough to have sex").

>>20669482
>>20669447

Weininger

>>20350745
Dumb hole, read pic related.

Women can't separate their personalities and sexuality, it's all they have.