/lit/ - Literature

>>16411247
In all honesty, do you have any mental impairment? You said Egypt had ceased being ''mystical'' for a long time and I told you that their practices were still the same in covering knowledge, much like all restrictions in esoteric traditions as you pointed out.

>The secrecy of esoteric doctrines does not imply anything at all about the superiority or inferiority of exoteric doctrines.
When did I say this? I merely pointed out how Egypt conserved the same application of esoteric revelation, that is, it was not freely, superficially done to the masses. Can you understand a single post of mine or are you just dishonest like all the others to whom I've been replying?