[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21727550 [View]
File: 15 KB, 386x423, technological-slavery-paperback-by-kaczynski-theodore-john-love-unique-used-386x423.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21727550

Technical literature on self-propagating systems? I am most interested in math or economics, but anything will do. Here's the basic definition of a self-propagating system.
>Proposition 1. In any environment that is sufficiently rich, self-propagating systems will arise, and natural selection will lead to the evolution of self-propagating systems having increasingly complex, subtle, and sophisticated means of surviving and propagating themselves.
>Proposition 2. In the short term, natural selection favors self-propagating systems that pursue their own short-term advantage with little or no regard for long-term consequences.
>A corollary to Proposition 2 is:

>Proposition 3. Self-propagating subsystems of a given supersystem tend to become dependent on the supersystem and on the specific conditions that prevail within the supersystem.
>Proposition 4. Problems of transportation and communication impose a limit on the size of the geographical region over which a self-prop system can extend its operations.

>Human experience suggests:

>Proposition 5. The most important and the only consistent limit on the size of the geographical regions over which self-propagating human groups extend their operations is the limit imposed by the available means of transportation and communication. In other words, while not all self-propagating human groups tend to extend their operations over a region of maximum size, natural selection tends to produce some self-propagating human groups that operate over regions approaching the maximum size allowed by the available means of transportation and communication.
>Proposition 6. In modern times, natural selection tends to produce some self-propagating human groups whose operations span the entire globe. Moreover, even if human beings are some day replaced by machines or other entities, natural selection will still tend to produce some self-propagating systems whose operations span the entire globe.
>Proposition 7. Where (as today) problems of transportation and communication do not constitute effective limitations on the size of the geographical regions over which self-propagating systems operate, natural selection tends to create a world in which power is mostly concentrated in the possession of a relatively small number of global self-propagating systems.

I remember finding out about them in 2015-16 while playing with compsci and math, but I don't remember wherefrom. They were not referred to as self-propagating systems or automata, however.

Here's Plato's excellent maxim for the golden rule of self-propagatinf systems:
>The useful is thr noble and the hurtful is the base.
>The Republic, V

>> No.21697748 [View]
File: 15 KB, 386x423, technological-slavery-paperback-by-kaczynski-theodore-john-love-unique-used-386x423.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21697748

>3. The political left is technological society's first line of defense against revolution. In fact, the left today serves as a kind of fire extinguisher that douses and quenches any nascent revolutionary movement.

>What do I mean by "the left"? If you think that racism, sexism, gay rights, animal rights, indigenous people's rights, and "social justice" in general are among the most important issues that the world currently faces, then you are a leftist as I use that term. If you don't like this application of the word "leftist," then you are free to designate the people I'm referring to by some other term. But, whatever you call them, the people who extinguish revolutionary movements are the people who are drawn indiscriminately to causes: racism, sexism, gay rights, animal rights, the environment, poverty, sweatshops, neocolonialism... it's all the same to them.

>These people constitute a subculture that has been labelled "the adversary culture." Whenever a movement of resistance begins to emerge, these leftists (or whatever you choose to call them) come swarming to it like flies to honey until they outnumber the original members of the movement, take it over, and turn it into just another leftist faction, thereby emasculating it. The history of "Earth First!" provides an elegant example of this process.

Just as the "leftists" swarmed to socialism and communism, utterly derailed it, and turned it into a shitty bourgeois idpol golem. Any literature about this phenomenon?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]