/lit/ - Literature

Where do I start with Hindu Philosophy?
Please do the needful sirs

>>20031431
“Liberalism” is not “liberal,” in fact, it’s something like neo-fascism (or neo-Marxism) in which, ironically, all dissenters to this authoritarian ideology are themselves accused of being “fascist,” “brainwashed by alt-right misinformation,” and the like. This is classic psychological projection — those with the most authoritarian tendencies, snobbishly looking down on and heckling those who haven’t been caught in their net as themselves being “fascists”, “fascist-sympathizers,” “brainwashed by the far-right,” etc. Modern Western societies are some of the most authoritarian and the most morally degenerate, and the word “liberal” is a sort of demonic inversion of and net over this. The power elite does whatever they want — impose authoritarian measures to deal with the spread of COVID-19, normalize certain teachings and a lens of interpreting reality throughout the news, academia, and Hollywood which views all members of one group (heterosexual White men) as inherently “oppressors” and all other groups as “oppressed,” bait Russia to war with NATO expansion then run military propaganda priming us for war with them to satisfy the ends of the military-industrial complex, then retroactively says all these things are “liberal,” “true,” “valid,” “good” and “normal” to believe and have faith in. The Western media could convince people that eating your own shit is a good way to simultaneously a good way to show solidarity with George Floyd and the stop the spread of COVID, and this would then be a “liberal” idea if Don Lemon repeated it enough, and people who objected to this would unironically be called “anti-shit-eaters” and the like.