[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22026509 [View]
File: 141 KB, 627x376, hume.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22026509

>>22026436
Based and Humepilled.

>> No.19899533 [View]
File: 142 KB, 627x376, hume.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19899533

Take the Hume pill.

>> No.19840900 [View]
File: 142 KB, 627x376, hume.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19840900

Was Hume based?

>> No.16168322 [View]
File: 142 KB, 627x376, hume.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16168322

What do people who really dig deep into philosophy get out of it?

When I try to read philosophical texts I often feel like I'm just adding extra layers of impractical befuddlement and pointless systems of thought to my brain, when I would be better off investing my energies (supposedly the average human brain only has about fours a day in which it can engage in serious focus) into something that improves my long-term lot in life, or increases my competence in creative/artistic pursuits. Philosophy when read by non-philosophers is basically a consumptive hobby, when the most meaningful hobbies are ones in which you create something lasting.

I think a lot of it has to do with people trying to find "one weird trick" to living, or the socially/sexually/economically ostracised feeling better about themselves by cultivating the ability to engage in intellectual one-upmanship in lieu of living a good life.

t. brainlet

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]