/lit/ - Literature

>>19261482
This is more true and pithy than it has any right to be...socialists always position themselves in front of others/their betters and insist they try to refute them because that's the extent of their existence, meanwhile functional people just ignore them because they actually do things and matter in some way.

>a thread is getting 3 replies a minute
>multiple in depth conversations happening
>decide to post in the thread
>thread goes absolutely silent and archives after an hour
it always makes me think i somehow killed the thread when this happens and i feel guilt even though i know i shouldn't

I think Evola and his autism is very interesting and i’d ironically read it but i feel like actually taking the time to do it is to give up dignity that I can’t get back

How do you shameless losers that make up most this board do it? Is it easier when you’re already at rock bottom? I’d probably lose all my friends if they saw me reading that shit

>reading book
>feel my tummy rumbling with the hungies and can't concentrate until I eat

what's your favourite reader fuel?

What translation of the divine comedy do u recommend?

I like everything about books and reading except actually reading

the only books I enjoy reading are musicians autobiography. is a bad thing?

>>15746951
>>15746958
>tfw you realise your post was bad but people reply to it before you can delete it and you get embarrassed.
i meant that the pigs in the story could not have acted upon their greed to the extent they did if they were not smart to enough to manipulate and plan the way they did, regardless of the expression 'as greedy as a pig'. if pigs were dumb, they wouldn't be able to plan or manipulate the other animals in the first place they way they did