/lit/ - Literature

>>12691058
ever hear of something called physiognomy?

Stirner posits that ideology is more or less an empty concept, and that we are to assume only in our own rationality and ego (as a precis). From his rejection of servility to the cognitively exogenous, which could include an ideology of the reference to history for reasoning, could we then conclude that a system of morality based on external inputs, including our experiences, is compromised, and thus we ought to base our morality in a coeval basis, with no a priori assumptions? An ad hoc morality if you will. Am i being retarded here?

>>8335301
>>8335317
Do you even max your stirners?

>>6573886
The spooks.... the spooks.

>>6445055
because the only photo of his makes him look beta

only confirmed picture of him

what's your personal spook pet peeve /lit/?

mine's philosophy

>>6286697
Stirner was like an even uglier Nietzsche

So, /lit/, I want to read Stirner, but I haven't read Hegel and know virtually nothing about his philosophy. Should I tackle Hegel first? Or maybe do some readings that are essential for Hegel then work my way up?

>>6260211
>Stirner
only from the waist up

>>6069601

Is this Max Stirner?

also Stirner pictures thread

Just how right was he?

Was Stirner even real or was it a joke pulled by Karl and Engels?

is this max stirner? if not, then who is he?

>>5836966
they did take a picture of stirner though

>tfw there actually exists a photo of stirner
Woah

(source: http://www.paudedamasc.com/?biografia=Max_Stirner))

>tfw when Saint Max really looked more like a gormless shutin than a transgressive, hawk-nosed ubermensch

>>5259907
>Maxie
>not always right