/lit/ - Literature

What about big G?

>>1969029

i don't see what's difficult to understand about this sentence, it's widely accepted that philosophy and mathematics redefine problems in ways which we can understand and deal with.

You think real problems are solved with philosophy? The context of that thread was that the OP was expecting too much from philosophy.

>>1743650
>>1743650

>killing is just killing it just happens

This is the kind of pathetic, fatalistic opinions of people who surrender to absurdity.

America has gone the other direction but comes with the same results. They cannot distinguish what is inside their minds from reality and thus we get this tasteless objective absolutism and addiction to dehumanisation.

They are just as bad as you.

How can you know that that anon wasn't capable of understanding your expanded point?

What evidence is there that he is a dismissible piece of shit? And if you regard all anon as dismissible pieces of shit then why do you even come here?

>>1666966

Nothing is 'sacred' for me, except perhaps the struggle to avoid seeing things as sacred.

George Orwell, Ernest Hemingway, G.K. Chesterton, Jack Keruoac and Emily Bronte are all supposed to have suffered from dyspraxia.

Does /lit/ think there is a correlation? I have an idea that being developmentally detached from the physical world can force people into the world of intellectual creativity and enchain them to the life of the perceptive observer.

A similar thing could happen with some debilitating illness in the socially crucial years of youth, such as what happened to Camus.

Any /lit/izens suffer from a developmental disorder or have similar experiences to the ones I have detailed? Do your experiences reflect my analysis?