/lit/ - Literature

Can we come to a consensus?
What were his critiques of capitalism?
How did he think it would be solved?

Is socialism inevitable?

The way I see our economic future panning out over the course of the next few centuries, I can only see the need for human labor diminishing as a result of the rise of AI. Our economy will become so productive that human labour is simply not required to produce an abundance of output. Theoretically, this doesn't have to be a bad thing - it could liberate us from the drudgery of work. However, if we refuse to take steps to redistribute wealth, I feel we could have mass riots and civil unrest. Socialism seems to be the only viable solution at this point.

Please don't delete this mods, I want to have good faith attempt at reasonable discussion and /his/ is /pol/-lite at this point.

>Muh labor
There. No need to read literally anything he has written.

>value isn't how much you'd like to have something, it's a spooky ghost that goes to live in stuff you work on for a socially necessary amount of time.
What did he mean by this?