/lit/ - Literature

>>22598909

No just funny to giggle at your lack of self awareness

>>22089300
Baiting customers into buying emily wilson translation.

400 words down, and rest.

>>21938145
>that video

>>21618888
MY SIDES

>at penn state altoona
>reading first draft manuscript copies of shakespeare
>macbeth stabs the king
>monk wrote in the margins “THATS GOTTA HURT!”

>>21278958

>>20369557
Okay didnt expect that last line

>finally bought a Parker 51 fountain pen
>took a gamble on it not knowing model or condition
>works perfectly out of the box
>1948 aerometric
>no scratches
>writes like butter

>>19611777

>>18367542
>I hate flamboyance and pride parades.
>I wish I could atleast have a homofash bf like Mishima who would want to keep it as a secret, but all I find are loud, flamboyant and obnoxious progressive fags.

This. I fucked a femboy /trap more than once but in secret and it was alright but i coudlnt do ti in the open. The fag community is annoying and frustrating. Theyre also really disgusting people. I know people who claim to be bi but they've never been with the opposite sex. Sometimes i feel its a trend to be a faggot or say you're bi.

>11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities and about anything that is said concerning minorities. The terms "negro," "oriental," "handicapped" or "chick" for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. "Broad" and "chick" were merely the feminine equivalents of "guy," "dude" or "fellow." The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights activists have gone so far as to reject the word "pet" and insist on its replacement by "animal companion." Leftish anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the world "primitive" by "nonliterate." They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)
>12. Those who are most sensitive about "politically incorrect" terminology are not the average black ghetto-dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any "oppressed" group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class families.

How do you refute this?

>>16792070
This. Right here.

>>16481371

>>13299893
Universal reaction whenever someone reads anything I've written.

>>10459845

>>9390881
>(Please note well that because this site is premised on quality, many science-fiction and fantasy authors and books important to the history of the field are absent from the lists because I felt their value to be only historical.)

well a bunch of SFF authors just got fuckin' owned

>>9112962

>>8474156
>Perhaps our trees fail to grow as high on account of the ivy and the vines that cling to them.
Schop-senpai would be proud.

>This deadlock of classification is clearly discernible in the need to expand the formula: the basic LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) becomes LGBTQIA (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning, Intersex, Asexual) or even LGBTQQIAAP (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Questioning, Intersex, Asexual, Allies, Pansexual). To resolve the problem, one often simply adds a + which serves to include all other communities associated with the LGBT community, as in LGBT+. This, however, raises the question: is + just a stand-in for missing positions like “and others,” or can one be directly a +?

>>5325361

>>4495049
>>4495051

I got so fucking #rekt