/lit/ - Literature

>NOOOOO YOU CAN'T VALUE LIFE LOOK SEE THESE ARGUMENTS SHOW YOU ARE WRONG WHY WON'T YOU LISTEN TO LOGIC???

>>21623707

>>20940751
No.

His philosophy can be summed up as: Be Yourself.

Wikipedia

Only out of touch people would write "philosophy" in books now. The great philosophy works of this century will be tweeted.

Philosophy isn't about learning facts or explaining things. Try again, retard.

>>19932987
>he thinks masculinity means beating people up
Cringe.

Nietzsche isn't philosophy, try again. His writings are social criticism and a Mishima-esque attempt at confronting his own emasculation which ultimately failed disastrously for him.

>>19897063
>we're not progressing at all
>we're
>we
Collectivists and believers in "society" can tongue my anus.

Just browse rich kids on Instagram, faggot.

>>19849497
Spending time reading about and worrying about why people you don't like are bad and what's bad about them and why this is all so important and worth meditating upon is utterly pathetic. I can feel the self hatred that you seek a distraction from oozing through your projections.

Microsoft word

The Bible.

Adorno.
>This is the paradox of mass culture. The more ahistorical and pre-ordained its procedures are, the less temporal relationships become a problem for it and the less it succeeds in transposing these relationships into a dialectical unity of temporal moments, the more craftily it employs static tricks to deceive us into seeing new temporal content in what it does, then the less it has left to oppose to the time beyond itself and all the more fatally does it fall victim to that time. Its ahistoricality is the tedium which it affects to relieve. It evokes the question whether or not the one-dimensional time which is characteristic of the blind course of history is even identical with the timelessness of the ever-same, identical with fate.