/lit/ - Literature

>>14445090
Grug them and take everything they have.

>>13395587
That's right.

>>13371462
I should be able to take those properties for myself because I am stronger and more intelligent than that chink.

>>13352689
Imagine saying this to a caveman. This is so divorced from natural law and eugenic order that it's laughable.

>>13011052
Command economy without Marxist dogma, and with incentives in place and an anti-egalitarian culture with a clear hierarchy.
Perfect information = better use of resources. Total control of the organs of production allows everything to be used to greater ends, like total adoption of fission power in a short period of time, or superprojects like a space elevator. Capitalism gives us trinkets and do-dads.

>Wow, so I have to philosophically justify my subjective opinion that chocolate tastes good?
It is not a subjective opinion. If this is valid, then it would mean it is not subjective and that differing opinions speak to a matter of something being pathologically wrong with the individual, i.e. he/she may lack the neurological developments needed to perceive and assess it. The same way many of the masses lack the ability to discern melody which their "opinions" on music, is like a blind man opining on artwork.
You're just low IQ.

>Joyce
Into the fire it goes.