/lit/ - Literature

>>22075483
>beautiful

>>15350260
this was great. thanks for the laugh anon
>>15350688
I really hope you're being ironic

>>14980497
>implying that the masculine Greeks were homos
legitimately the funniest thing I've read all day

>>13207681
>>13207757
>>13207779
>>13208060
>Writes with a computer.

>>12452707
>How do you plan on getting people to buy your teacups?

>>By spending hundreds of millions of dollars on overbearing advertising programs that get people to falsely associate my $0.05c assembly-line teacups made without regard for environmental regulations or economic sustainability with a sense of "family" and "nostalgia" when locally-produced teacups could do the same job better

>So why do we let you have unwarranted influence over our social policy making again?

>>11196567
>He thinks spirituality is about the letter of the law, not the spirit

First of all
>doxx
pic related
Secondly,
>not using a pseudonym for maximum pseud
wait a sec, what's everyone's stance on pseudonym's around here? Imo, if you want to remain closed off from the public it's a good idea. Probably something that OP should have done. otherwise, thoughts?

>>11157003
>members of the cultural Marxism community
>>>/reddit/

>>11144488

>>11119727
>Vargpill
Ted Kaczynski is leagues about that retard.

>>11104090
>redpilled
Pic related
Anything that you have picked up from boards like /pol/ are the exact opposite of the truth. virtually every info graphic that comes from their is deceptive or fails to reveal the whole picture. Having said that, this is because majority of the books and literature they read are very narrow and confined to a few selections. The versions of history they like are only selected ones which have 0 consensus. Even their idol David Irving believes the holocaust happened at the functional level (There are two camps that debate the validity of the holocaust, firstly there is the traditional perspective, and the functional, the functional side argues that Jews died through other means than gas chambers more than not).
Anyway, a bit ranty on my behalf, I wouldn't recommend even reading if your goal is to get "redpilled", you're better off experiencing your own life for the most truest sense of the world without books if you want the truth, eliminate the Internet from your life which isn't function either if that's what you really want. No, finding out truths doesn't necessarily mean your life's quality will change either. It's only when you assume it's bad is the truth really hurtful, and just because you want to choose between the truth and er, whatever, doesn't mean this 'whatever' means hedonism either. Try and free yourself from thinking in dichotomies and address the word for how it really is: vastly complicated and complex.
Again, sorry for the rant. I have nothing better to do tonight really.

>>11092395
>Europe's greatest esoteric philosopher
They're certainly not bringing their best!

>>10943379
>"autodidact" thinks he understands philosophy

>>10796379
There were plenty of famous murderers (and normal by cultural standards) that weren't idiots throughout history. Like kings and crusaders for example. Most of history actually. You fucking bourgeois leftist retard

>>10680954
maybe for you because you don't know how to apply that skill to other realms

>>10680713
>t. causally determined newfag
>needs to learn how greentext works

>>10633864
>255 posts
>bunch of verysmarts bragging about their "deep" and "original" thoughts

>>10346134
>analytic philosopher
>good scholar