/lit/ - Literature

>>901681

Kant was a shit of a man.

But his Kantian system of ethics has been a useful base for later systems, such as Rawls writings.

Of course, the Kantian system itself has more holes in it than a Hissidic Jew in a Somali Pirate Mosque, and is clearly a morality system designed to appeal to sociopaths and asspies.

Kant can take his bible and choke on it. He ruined a woman's life once by telling her that she would be immoral if she went back on her pledge to marry a known asshole who took all her money.

She followed his advice and her life was ruined.

Kant used her as an argument.

That means Kant is a hypocrite as he claims that people should not use each other as tools, as under the Kantian system, you'd discern using and being used as being immoral.

Therefore, Kant is a dick, and the bible suits him, because it is a dick book for dicks.

>>801361
10/10

Whenever I take up "Pride and Prejudice" or "Sense and Sensibility," I feel like a barkeeper entering the Kingdom of Heaven. I mean, I feel as he would probably feel, would almost certainly feel. I am quite sure I know what his sensations would be -- and his private comments. He would be certain to curl his lip, as those ultra-good Presbyterians went filing self-complacently along.

>>530055

>i'll just go ahead and subtly boast in a thread where subtle braggadocio is being satirized

>>513547

>>492579

Look at him mocking society with his tie. Most of you sheeple wear ties becuase you dream of material success by 'climbing the ladder' in your shitty cubicle jobs, when all you can hope for is the exploitation of your fruitless hard work and menial talents, so you can go home and be fat, primetime-addicted slobs. He laughs at you. Look at that hair. His hair looked like that when he woke up (around noon, natch) because he doesn't give a damn.