/lit/ - Literature

>>12917379
>They never actually explain how they will avoid the re-emergence of sophisticated technologies
Pic related, I don't know to which level this is an accurate reading (certainly it won't be like the 17th century, but rather something yet unseen), but it's true resources are running out and more difficult to collect.
I discovered pine tree Twitter about a month ago and this is pretty much what they're on about, Borzoi even specified that there's almost no true ecofascists, and that most of the people calling themselves that haven't really read much about the topic, just edgy wannabes like you say.

As much as I like conspiracy stuff, I don't know if I buy the story of MKUltra driving Ted mad. He even said himself in a letter that the experiments were a negative experience but nothing too bad, and I see no reason to believe he's lying (even being in jail wouldn't influence this reply), but of course I could be wrong.

>>12610146
>People without technology can forget a lot in a 1000 years. The person who knows "best" is always the one who is alive