/lit/ - Literature

>>969171
/lit/ - Why Nabokov is better than the other shit people bring up

>>966846Still, it's a good choice if the OP is prepared for a lot of heavy reading.

Well, that was what he requested!

>>949834
ONE ON ONE PUNK

>>A work of art has no importance whatever to
>>society. It is only important to the individual, >>and only the individual reader is important to >>me. I don't give a damn for the group,
>>the community, the masses, and so forth. >>Although I do not care for the slogan "art for >>art's sake"-- because unfortunately such >>promoters of it as, for instance, Oscar Wilde >>and various dainty poets, were in reality rank >>moralists and didacticists--there can be no >>question that what makes a work of fiction safe >>from larvae and rust is not its social >>importance but its art, only its art.

itt: vladimir nabokov

>>838022

Nabokov
Who read somthing (no Lolita, please)

Sup /lit/erates

Me and a few friends are in the process of founding a new company (discussing and brainstorming while drinking mostly), but I'd like to see if there is anything out there I should read.

Business 101, that sort of shit. I could simply google myself, but I'd like to see if anyone here can recommend one that would actually help us out.

nabokov not related

>>714997

It's his most popular one by far. But I've seen Pale Fire and Ada or Ardor as well.

ITT: Authors who are known for one of their worst books or at least authors who are in your opinion.

Nabokov, I liked pretty much everything he wrote better than Lolita(Not because I'm a Pedohater or such a thing)

Did someone say Faulkner, because I think someone said Faulkner