/lit/ - Literature

>please teach me neotheosophy on your discord

>>20538767
Based and directionbrained. Everything has always been red states vs blue states.

>>19961216
I would rather be the lowest status male than the highest status female. Rationality is that valueable. Solitude is a fruit for men and a curse for women.

>>19928823
>what i was just skeptic of skepticism haha imagine that now my dogmatic assertions must be true

>>19658876
>i'm not a pseud like those other occultists i'm a primordial racist wiccan

>>19650855
>don't pretend to be any smarter than you actually are
Good advice

>get an amazing idea
>think about for an hour
>it seems self evident and childish
>feel stupid for even having to think about it
>give up idea
>I can't come up with anything intellectual enough to start writing seriously
Am I overthinking, a retard or a genius? Is image related me? How do you pick your ideas?

>>19499409
>tardlarpers calling other people dumb

>>19449109
>You don’t need abstract and confusing intellectual ‘proofs’ for God. These are post hoc anyway, and are more to edify faith than to construct faith. Most people just ‘know’ or ‘feel’ God exists and they don’t need much more than that
The absolute state of herd animals

>camus

What's his favorite book?

>1984 is unquestionably the best/definitive novel of the 20th century

>>18934388
Based retard

>>18932720
>based redditor

>>18900222
>(((Wikipedia)))

>Once upon a time, I, Chuang Chou, dreamt I was a butterfly, fluttering hither and thither, a veritable butterfly, enjoying itself to the full of its bent, and not knowing it was Chuang Chou. Suddenly I awoke, and came to myself, the veritable Chuang Chou. Now I do not know whether it was then I dreamt I was a butterfly, or whether I am now a butterfly dreaming I am a man. Between me and the butterfly there must be a difference. This is an instance of transformation.

How do you deal with pseuds? Have you ever called a pseud out for being a brainlet?

Wow you fail at life OP

>>18853226
>First world problems

>>18846478
>What books capture the soullessness of the modern cagie?

>>18836459
>Yes, according to the common definition of the words in that sentence.
>common definition

>>18836071
>So fucking hilarious, dude. I’m in stitches. If you’re not going to take literature seriously enough to stop joking about some Melbournian twink, then get the fuck out of my face.

>>18830937
>Disregard “experts”.

>>18813449
>P1: Kant can only claim that animals are Irrational by proving that they do not 'act'* with Perfect Reason.
>P2: To prove animals do not 'act' with Perfect Reason Kant must know what a "Perfectly-Rational-Being" would act like.
>P3: Kant cannot possibly know what a "Perfectly-Rational-Being" would act like.
>C: Kant cannot therefore conclude that animals are definitely Irrational.