/lit/ - Literature

>>6726453
>as you can tell from the grey, speckled walls behind me...
does john green not know what speckled means?

i'm imagining that all of the cuts between shots are him having to stop and explain why he's shouting at a camera to concerned patrons

>>6639071
>"Motion" means "change"
no it doesn't

refuted

>>6414461
eddie isn't here, my friend
>>6414496
you should read books

>>5871584
>I always assumed he was someone you read when you were first getting into books and then quickly forgot about once you found the better stuff
so pleb

>>5858081
holy fuck, i remember reading this in middle school, throwback

you're looking for other media theory books? you might look into marshall mcluhan

>or baudrillard

>>5734456
she doesn't feel lines, she feels warmth and that warmth gives her a sudden body consciousness she hadn't before. she imagines her body, in her stupor, in an elementary way, and imagines her veins as lines stretching from her throat to her extremities, and sees the alcohol/blood coursing through these lines.

>>5387385
lit plebs are those who consume without producing, not those who consume any particular thing. a person who reads verlaines is no better than a person who reads poes if both do nothing but read. they're simply different manifestations of the same plebeian entity.
>harsh realities

>>5375905
>Film Grad here
you invalidated your point before you even established it
>>5375885
also a stupid fucking post, you know jack shit about filmmaking until you pick up a camera and go through the process. i don't care how much lit you've read about lighting or how well you can appreciate bertolucci's use of it or how keen an eye you have for it in your everyday life, unless you yourself have designed a lighting setup and shot with it, you don't know what you're talking about.