/lit/ - Literature

>>12936562
I'm far from happy with my writings. I am not an accomplished writer nor an extremely talented one, but at the very least I'm not pretentious or cowardly like you.

>I don't value what they've accomplished and I'm surprised that anybody does, really.

That's hilarious coming from someone who considers himself a writer. Struggles are what most literature is based around. Human struggle, namely. They went through excruciating mental and physical difficulty for themselves and for the nations they represent (I am speaking of Olympic weightlifting). A gormless weakling like you would crumble so easily under such immense pressure, yet you laugh at it from a distance because you know you'll never have to go through it.

It's funny that in this case your physical ability is limited, so you immerse yourself into a mental craft. You are essentially the polar opposite of sportsmen, but somehow you think that makes you better than them. Men of true worth are both scholars and champions of strength. Alexander the great, Ceaser, Socrates, Michelangelo and so many more. I pity you, worthless creature that you are. I'll have a drink for you tonight. A toast to yet another human who will die nameless and unaccomplished.