[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.11619458 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1000x1000, 1428798722355.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11619458

Here it is.

>> No.11055040 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1000x1000, 1428798722355.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11055040

Not really, but he should be taken more seriously, especially by continental philosophers, because his concept of the Creative Nothing, and his thoughts on semiotics are quite interesting and sometimes makes me wonder if he influenced both Nietzsche and Derrida.

>> No.9783389 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1000x1000, Spook in the Shell.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9783389

>>9780592
>murder is real, and there are many words you can call it.
I disagree. Not because "murder" doesn't happen and people don't die, but because murder is a very specific thing that requires a PoV to be understood. There's just so many variable for things dying or being killed than simply saying "murder is wrong" strikes me as shortsighted.

>wrong, illegal, are a few.
Those two words alone mean pretty different things. Making a mistake isn't breaking the law, nor are both evil, nor are being incorrect epistemological. Just because things tend to overlap doesn't make them the same.

>>9780595
Getting kind of ad hominem here. But your question on law is interesting. I'm not sure if we should get rid of law. Perhaps what we think of as law -if we accept that it arised at some point in history and so on- can be replaced with something better. Of course, this entails understanding the *world* in which these laws are going to function; 'cause "do not steal" or "do not murder" don't really cut it if we live in a cyberpunk world (to give one example).

>> No.8789996 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1000x1000, 1428798722355.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8789996

Stirner is the more meme-worthy philosopher obviously.

But Gödel was probably more correct within his own context.

>> No.8447239 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1000x1000, 1428798722355.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8447239

>>8447059
>He's just a meme

Every philosopher is a meme.

>> No.8429501 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1000x1000, 1428798722355.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8429501

>>8427367
Just read the Ego and it's Own. Not really that difficult of a book to understand unless you are severely uneducated in very fundamental philosophy.

>> No.7131743 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1000x1000, 1428798722355.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7131743

>>7131711
Clearly not.

>> No.6568872 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1000x1000, 1427121980108.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6568872

>> No.6391153 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1000x1000, 6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391153

>>6390798
is this about stirner personally or just his philosophy of egoism?

if the former, who cares?

nailing a political group on the latter is just silly, since you can belong to anything as an egoist. please explain why you would think otherwise.

>> No.6306196 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1000x1000, fucking bato.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6306196

>>6305351
you're right, the side views are getting old

i tried doing some spooky estimation of what his face looks like, using two mirrored side views, and guess what?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]