/lit/ - Literature

>>12185653
man behind this post ...

>>12031048
A-ancestor? Hyuk, well is that you? *does the Charleston* Soo-wee!

>>12013212
Come to me when you're published, kid. heh

How do subvocalizers deal with being forced to read every single worthless shitpost on this website aloud in their brains?

Sure th-ii-ing baby! Read my seminal rollercoaster ride - Gravity's Rainbow!

>>11521952
I feel like age of consent is arbitrary due to different 'blooming'. I hit puberty at 8 and would obviously be sexually active before others who hit it at a later age.

I really only like the schoolgirl aesthetic, we started dating when I was 18ish, and she 16ish. I'd never go out with someone that young now at 20. I do want someone who is mentally and physically mature.

Just my thoughts. Call them out if you think they're immoral, but I do think lots of what we brand 'pedofilic' and guarding of young bodies is uncalled for. On the contrary, I also think that someone at 18 can be immature and prepubescent - and they should not have sex.

>>11200730
Have you noticed that all the people who have genuine intellectual achievements like Elon Musk or Bill Gates or famous scientists have a "childish and nerdy" demeanour that is laughed at by snarky females, journalists, humanities majors?

Similarly with many sci first writers, genre fiction writers, athletes, tv show creators, rappers. And not because those are intellectuals. And it's not a "Reddit" attitude because that implies morals and tastes handed down from corporations.

The common denominator is an honest pursuit of their own tastes. I mention this on /lit/ because this common denominator is absent in the stagnant world of literary fiction, English literature, and humanities academia, with its focus on sterile worship of older works, herd mentality that discourages praise of contemporary work unless it conforms with the concrete straitjacket of tradition, and relentless promotion of endless critiques that are either leftist screeds or nonsensical dirge.

It's fucking tiring seeing you guys talk about the same authors endlessly because you've been told what to think.

>>11170942
>picks up any historical book
>it isn't of dubious validity because I trust "historians"

History is just looking at 'sources,' of course all of them come from an ideological prism themselves, or at least the sum of a source list will be.

>>10610033
>con

Try troll

>>9975821
Yeah, relaaaxxxxxx

Didn't Pinecone write a short little article about his thoughts on 9/11, close to right after it happened? Or am I imagining things/mixing him up with someone else? I can't find the article anywhere, at any rate. Anyone on /lit/ have a clue?

Those teeth don't lie.

Pic related would browse /x/ wasting all his talent roleplaying.