/lit/ - Literature

>>7240722
*your

>Humans are deeply social animals

Humans are social to /degrees/. They are not social animals by default, societies were a potential direction of progression and we capitalised on that due to having little to no other options. It is like learning to like your vegetables. Some humans are eager to eat vegetables from the very beginning, some don't mind them after a while and some will avoid them until they are on their deathbed.

>...they were all killed or exiled into the wilderness and died

Are you saying malicious people have been bred out of society? rofl

>because all of these things greatly benefit the survival of communities and thus the survival of the species.

Be honest with yourself, when was the last time you genuinely took a decision because it was the best decision for humanity, rather than yourself. Do you even think it is possible to behave objectively?

>egotistical
10/10 bait I got hooked like a mother

>>5081130
>Logica has been finished by Aristotle, hasn't it?

>>5019464
Here are some questions you didn't consider

What is good in this instance for the philosopher -- what does he seek.
Is forcing yourself to understand a concept whether it is distasteful to you or not ultimately always the worse? If the answer is sometimes, then when and where and how do you draw the line?

At the very least, a cleverer response would have been 'Define cherrypick'

Instead, you bring to the table this half baked notion that there is nothing to see here but the face value of the question.

Please try harder