/lit/ - Literature

>>21249460
>Once again, exploitation implies cheating and immoral behavior. One google search would keep you from repeating your nonsense.
pic related is the google search. see for yourself. this is roughly the definition I'm using. your problem is that you'd like me to use another definition, one that's morally tinged. but I have no obligation to use exactly the definition you want. moreover, we're talking science, which is another reason against employing the morally tinged definition over one that specifically concerns the process and not its moral evaluation.
Engels:
>According to the laws of bourgeois economics, the greatest part of the product does not belong to the workers who have produced it. If we now say: that is unjust, that ought not to be so, then that has nothing immediately to do with economics. We are merely saying that this economic fact is in contradiction to our sense of morality. Marx, therefore, never based his communist demands upon this

>>21249549
already debunked all of this throughout the thread.
>>21246267
>>21246421
>>21246668
>>21247357
>>21247647
>>21248003
>>21248033
>>21248163
come up with something better